|
Even though they are its primary consumers, men believe
that pornography is a terrible, awful, sad, sick problem facing
America. This is the official position the enlightened male must take
if he ever wants to have actual sex (with an actual woman) again.
And I am right on that bandwagon. There are many things wrong and
vile about pornography, particularly the disgraceful way it objectifies
really hot women.
Women are always reminding us how rotten and pathetic we men are for
peeking even maybe once or twice at naughty Web sites. And they are
right. We enlightened males know that these urges of ours are not
biological imperatives hard-wired into our brains, but symptoms of our
weakness and the skewed values of a sexist society. This is why, on
behalf of enlightened males nationwide, I was enormously distressed to
hear about a new study by scientists at Duke University that shows that
male rhesus monkeys will actually forgo nourishment to look at
photographs of naked female monkey bottoms.
Gina: You were not distressed at all. You were smug. You were practically simpering with delight.
Gene: Let me introduce Gina Barreca, an expert in feminist theory and a regular contributor to this column.
Gina: You love this study. Men love any pseudoscientific
justification for their simian behavior. This is no different from the
bogus theory that excuses men's marital infidelity by suggesting that
it is natural, a Darwinian adaptation to spread their seed and
propagate the species.
Gene: But this one is a scientific study, by actual science people,
conducted in an actual science place! Fact: Male monkeys paid a price
to see monkey porn.
Gina: It's ridiculous on its face.
Gene: Why?
Gina: Why on Earth would male monkeys pay to see up-close pictures
of naked female monkey butts when, any time they wanted, they could
just walk up to a female monkey and inspect her naked butt? Female
monkeys do not generally wear Prada jeans.
Gene: Maybe, just maybe, the male monkey would rather look at the
pictures than go through the whole rigmarole necessary to be permitted
to inspect the female monkey butt. Maybe he doesn't want to have to
first bring the female monkey a nut, which she will reject, so he then
has to bring her another, better nut. Maybe he doesn't want to have to
chatter in an engaging fashion, while she sits on that butt and judges
his chatter against the chatter of other male monkeys. Maybe he doesn't
want to have to first carefully groom himself of all his lice, except
the really nice, fat ones, which he will leave for her. Maybe he is
just tired of the whole complicated rumba and will happily pay the
price of giving up an apple juice in order to avoid the dance and take
his jollies elsewhere. What I am saying is that maybe this exhausting
ritual helps foster pornography (which, as an enlightened male, I of
course continue to find disgraceful).
Gina: You're probably misinterpreting this experiment, anyway. It may not even have implications about pornography.
Gene: I have on the line here Duke University neurobiology professor
Michael Platt, who conducted the study. Professor, do you see this as
possibly explaining male interest in pornography?
Prof. Platt: It raises that issue, yes -- that there might be a
biological reason, a good adaptive reason, in support of a male's
interest in looking at photographs of the sexual areas of females.
Gene: I rest my case.
Gina: Professor, did you find that the male monkeys preferred
skinny, nearly emaciated monkey butts, or, in fact, as I suspect, did
they prefer fully rounded, healthy, substantial monkey butts of the
sort that might belong to a female monkey with a full life and
responsibilities, who has better things to do than starve herself to
conform to some artificial, wildly oppressive, highly irrational and
uniquely male-human ideal of beauty?
Prof. Platt: Well, we didn't find evidence that they discriminated
amongst the different rear ends, but we didn't go out to test that.
Gina: I'll bet you didn't. Did you test to see whether female monkeys wanted to see male monkey butts?
Prof. Platt: No.
Gina: Were any woman scientists involved in the experiment?
Prof. Platt: No.
Gina: I rest my case.
Gene: You haven't refuted anything. We can't end the column here.
Gina: I think it's the perfect end. In fact, I'd pay to see it. |